Antiwar

Antiwar is pretty much never talked about in the media, the news, or even online. It is crazy to wrap your head around the idea that a certain topic is not discussed about more considering the wide realm of communication we currently live in. It is not a hidden fact that people talk about violence and anti-violence. Why are people so likely to openly discuss violence but not war?

 

After looking through the first antiwar article I was pretty confused. I had never seen an article like this before and so much talk about why people are against war. The second antiwar article had a plethora of sections to chose from when browsing the cite. Each section presented different types of information but that all lead back to the common concept of antiwar. 

I think it is safe to say that commonly considered “violent acts” do not have as an extensive affect that war does. I think with the extreme negative effects that war brings to America, people refrain from talking about it. With war comes effects on both the people of America and the government involved. Effects include, death and/or injury, illness, PTSD, disabilities, and many more physical and mental outcomes. On the other hand, the government may lose cities to war, go into great debt, loss of social order, and more. 

 

Antiwar is a known concept but definitely has many differing opinions. Whether the opinions are good or bad, it is still prevalent that antiwar is not talked about as much as you would think it is. Due to the outcomes brought by war, I believe the sore topic is too hard to discuss casually on the internet despite how big the web is.